Repository navigation
Conversation
Preview approval requiredThis pull request comes from a fork, so Mintlify won't build a preview until someone with write access approves commit |
|
@Wittig18 Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
|
Important Draft PR not reviewedDraft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.
To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration: reviews:
auto_review:
drafts: true
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Wittig18
force-pushed
the
solver/issue-489-109-a0
branch
from
October 22, 2026 04:14
eee50b9 to
c342efc
Compare
codeZe-us
self-requested a review
October 23, 2026 20:44
codeZe-us
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2026
Contributor
|
Hi @Wittig18 is this PR ready for review? |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I replaced the empty BreakpointManager stub in
apps/web/src/components/debug/BreakpointManager.tsxwith a client component. I also rendered it onapps/web/src/app/debug/page.tsx. I couldn't run anything here, so none of it has been compiled, linted or run in the browser. The component keeps breakpoint state in memory using types that mirror the RustBreakpointandBreakpointConditionfor the four kinds the issue lists: FunctionEntry, HostFunction, ContractCall and BudgetThreshold. The add form has a type selector and shows only the fields that type needs: contract address, function name or CPU instruction limit. It checks required fields and that the CPU limit is a positive integer. Each breakpoint in the list has an enable/disable switch, a hit count and a delete button. The styling uses the same slate and violet Tailwind classes asDecodeForm. There is no backend wiring, so hit counts always show 0 for now. The component also accepts optionalbreakpointsandonChangeprops so replay can hook in later.Changed files
apps/web/src/app/debug/page.tsxapps/web/src/components/debug/BreakpointManager.tsxTest plan
The web app has no existing test setup, so I added no tests. CI should run the
apps/weblint, type-check and build (next build). To check it by hand, open /debug, add one breakpoint of each type, toggle them, delete one, and confirm the validation errors appear for empty or invalid input.This PR was created as a draft by the issue solver bot. It will remain a
draft until repository CI passes.
Closes #489