[robertwidfen]

Description

They were not in sync.

Question actions_on_enter - should we follow:

• the README list save to clipboard as default
• the code has no actions assigned by default

Checklist

• I've read CONTRIBUTING.md and AI_POLICY.md
• all commits compile
• PR title uses (conventional commit message)[https://www.conventionalcommits.org/]
• includes breaking changes - please try to avoid if possible
  • I added "!" for attention in the PR title
  • I filled out "Breaking change" section above
• any merge conflicts were resolved via rebase rather than merge
• includes LLM/Generative AI generated code
  • I understand the code on a technical level
  • I vouch for the code

[robertwidfen]

Please do not miss:

Question actions_on_enter - should we follow:

• the README lists save to clipboard as default
• the code has no actions assigned by default

Currently I added it in the code - which is a breaking change. 🤔

[RobertMueller2]

Please do not miss:

Question actions_on_enter - should we follow:

* the README lists save to clipboard as default

* the code has no actions assigned by default

Currently I added it in the code - which is a breaking change. 🤔

I have not missed it ;) I was too lazy to type while on mobile earlier. It's definitely justifiable to add it if the documentation says it's there. Since nobody has complained about it, it's just as justifiable to remove it from the documentation. Believe it or not,I don't think I have an opinion on this. ;)

[robertwidfen]

Ok, then we keep it like this - IMHO it does no harm - if the documented behavior would have been "exit" I would have decided the other way around ;-)

So let's merge it now.