Skip to content

Review v1.5.0 - #45

Closed
dtibi69 wants to merge 12 commits into
review-v1.4.0from
review-v1.5.0
Closed

Review v1.5.0#45
dtibi69 wants to merge 12 commits into
review-v1.4.0from
review-v1.5.0

Conversation

@dtibi69

@dtibi69 dtibi69 commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

r2 = r**2
support_r = (r > 0.0) & (r < 1.0)
support_r = (r >= 0.0) & (r < 1.0)
r2 *= width_factor # optimized parameter (for L=4) to follow at best Littlewood Paley condition, see numerical integration in the notebook "BS_wavelet_kernel.ipynb"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this width factor also be applied to the support's indicator function? Otherwise, the radial bump is no longer continuous, and its value blows up toward infinity on both sides of the bump:

Image

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually the line denom = (1.0 - r2).clamp_min(eps) which comes just after puts the high valued segments (>1) to exp(-r2 / eps) (almost 0) so there is no discontinuity. But for readability I can limit also the r support to [0, width_factor**-.5[.

@pablo-richard pablo-richard Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dtibi69 dtibi69 closed this Jul 27, 2026
@dtibi69
dtibi69 deleted the review-v1.5.0 branch July 27, 2026 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants