Skip to content

feat(contract): define atomic and partial semantics for batch operations #191

Closed

Description

@arisu6804

Problem

Batch callers cannot safely retry when partial application and item results are unspecified.

Objective

Deliver a production-quality improvement to batch transfer, escrow, and release entrypoints that creates measurable value for correctness, security, reliability, performance, or maintainability.

Implementation scope

  • Document atomic or itemized behavior; bound batch size; return stable indexed results and enforce idempotency.

Acceptance criteria

  • Mixed-validity batches are deterministic; no item is applied twice; result ordering and error codes are stable.

Required validation

  • Mixed-batch, duplicate, limit, rollback, ordering, and retry tests.
  • Existing tests and CI remain passing.
  • Add regression coverage for the original failure mode.
  • Do not weaken, delete, or skip unrelated tests to obtain a green build.

PR quality bar

  • Keep the PR focused and explain design tradeoffs, compatibility impact, and test evidence.
  • Avoid typo-only, documentation-only, cosmetic-only, or unrelated refactor submissions.

Out of scope

  • Broad rewrites not required by the acceptance criteria.
  • Changes to unrelated services, contracts, or user flows.

Activity

  1. added
    enhancementNew feature or request
    Maybe RewardedThis issue may carry a reward
    GrantFox OSSOpen-source issue tracked by GrantFox
    priority:highHigh implementation priority
    on Aug 21, 2026
  2. greatest0fallt1me commented on Aug 27, 2026

    @greatest0fallt1me

    Hello Maintainers 👋,
    I’m interested in picking up this issue and contributing to the project.
    I have solid experience working across both frontend and blockchain layers, including building user interfaces with Next.js and developing Stellar smart contracts using Rust (Soroban). I’m familiar with translating Figma designs into pixel-accurate UIs, handling wallet integrations, and writing efficient, well-tested contract logic.
    I focus on writing clean, maintainable code, following repository standards, and keeping communication transparent throughout the development process. I can start immediately and complete the work within the expected timeframe.
    Excited to collaborate and add value to the project 🚀
Thank you!

  3. grantfox-oss commented on Aug 27, 2026

    @grantfox-oss

    🦊 GrantFox — @greatest0fallt1me has been assigned to this issue as part of the Third Campaign campaign!

    Next steps:

    1. Open a Pull Request referencing this issue (e.g., Closes #191)
    2. Your PR will be reviewed by the RemitFlow maintainers

    Good luck! Track your progress on GrantFox.

  4. grantfox-oss commented on Aug 27, 2026

    @grantfox-oss

    🎉 This issue has been marked as completed on GrantFox as part of the Third Campaign campaign!

    @greatest0fallt1me's PR #202 was approved and merged by @arisu6804.

    🏆 @greatest0fallt1me: You earned 45 FoxPoints for this contribution! Your current tier: Specialist (4,446 total points). Track your full progress on GrantFox.

    👏 Great work, @greatest0fallt1me! Keep contributing to RemitFlow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

GrantFox OSSOpen-source issue tracked by GrantFoxMaybe RewardedThis issue may carry a rewardThird CampaignThird Campaign contributionenhancementNew feature or requestpriority:highHigh implementation priority

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions