[WIP] Implicit derivatives for CTMRG - #413
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
After the build completes, the updated documentation will be available here |
…icitGradient` is limited to `SimultaneousCTMRG{<:HalfInfiniteProjector}`
pbrehmer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks really good to me! I would personally like to give SequentialCTMRG with implicit differentiation a try but we can of course also postpone this to a later PR.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Devos <ldevos98@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Devos <ldevos98@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Devos <ldevos98@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Devos <ldevos98@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Brehmer <paul.brehmer@univie.ac.at>
…dPointDifferentiation`
|
Windows CI is completely refusing to work for some reason, but other than that I think this has pretty much everything I had in mind for now. |
pbrehmer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to merge to me now! The Windows CI problems look like they are not really related to this PR in particular and rather some CI setup issue, if I'm not mistaken.
Adds implicit gradients for CTMRG contractions.
Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15030