Skip to content

quotes: the ask template, so sending one takes five minutes - #102

Merged
PipFoweraker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/quote-ask-template
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

PipFoweraker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/quote-ask-template

Conversation

@PipFoweraker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Asking is the only lawful route for the richest sources, and asking well is the cheapest risk reduction available. This makes it a copy-paste rather than an hour of drafting.

Eight required items, each present because leaving it out is a known failure. The three that matter most:

  • Say what the thing is. They are consenting to a context, not a reuse. A dark and often funny game is a different proposition from a documentary.
  • Describe where it appears, concretely. "On the screen shown when a player's run ends" is the fact that matters, and burying it is how someone ends up feeling misled by a technically accurate request.
  • State the default out loud: no reply means no use. Never "if I don't hear back I'll assume it's fine." The gate already encodes this as asked_no_reply, which is not a servable basis.

The template offers, unprompted, everything a person can ask for later: correction, different attribution, initials, anonymity, a note that their views have changed, or removal. Offering that before being asked is the difference between a permission request and a notification.

Notes cover the cases that trip: 80,000 Hours transcripts need two permissions; the Embedded Agency pair is co-authored so Garrabrant and Demski are separate asks; the list is grouped by author so one message covers two or three quotes; and a warm introduction makes the easy-no line matter more, since it arrives carrying social weight a cold email does not.

The sourcing research found that for LessWrong, the Alignment Forum, pre-2022
EA Forum posts, most personal blogs, books and podcasts there is no licence and
asking is the only lawful route. It also found that asking WELL is the cheapest
risk reduction available, and costs one email.

Eight items, each in the template because leaving it out is a known failure.
The three that matter most:

Say what the thing IS. They are consenting to a context, not to a reuse. A dark
and often funny game is a different proposition from a documentary, and saying
so plainly is the difference between consent and a surprise.

Describe where it appears, concretely. "On the screen shown when a player's run
ends" is the fact that matters, and burying it is how someone ends up feeling
misled by a technically accurate request.

State the default OUT LOUD: no reply means no use. Never "if I don't hear back
I'll assume it's fine." The gate already encodes this as asked_no_reply, which
is not a servable basis.

The template also offers, unprompted, everything a person can ask for later:
correction, different attribution, initials, anonymity, a note that their views
have changed, or removal. Offering it before being asked is the difference
between a permission request and a notification.

Notes cover the cases that trip: 80,000 Hours transcripts need TWO permissions
because their terms are explicitly restrictive; the Embedded Agency pair is
co-authored so both Garrabrant and Demski get asked; the list is grouped by
author so one message covers two or three quotes; and a warm introduction makes
the easy-no line matter more rather than less, since it arrives carrying social
weight a cold email does not.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCAwQ2dTCtpR8rTrEfv5ee
@PipFoweraker
PipFoweraker merged commit da11ef1 into main Aug 31, 2026
4 checks passed
@PipFoweraker
PipFoweraker deleted the docs/quote-ask-template branch August 31, 2026 05:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant