Repository navigation
docs: explain adoption costs, alpha limits and human evidence - #8
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Clarify when existing identifiers and search are sufficient, including ObjectId workflows. Describe the operational costs of an extra alias/mapping and distinguish those from the existing uint64/UUID codecs. Add explicit stable-release review criteria and a manual-entry study protocol that keeps human observations separate from synthetic checks.
The README now states that no human-entry advantage is established and that a stable release alone does not create an integration need. Declined integrations are not reopened. Runtime, wire formats, versions and published packages are unchanged.
Validation:
pnpm test:packagepassed against the actual archive in a clean offline consumer, including runtime hashes, ESM, types, licenses and documentation links. Local Markdown links and English-only new material were checked. No human timing or error results are claimed.