Skip to content

Re-verify PCF note against arXiv:2508.01581v1 (2026-07-20): verified clean #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
OpenCnid wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Re-verify PCF note against arXiv:2508.01581v1 (2026-07-20): verified clean #2

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 12 additions & 3 deletions density-chain.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ venue: "arXiv preprint (cs.AI; math.CO; stat.CO), 2025"
source: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01581 (pinned: arXiv:2508.01581v1, 2025-08-03)"
license: "CC BY 4.0"
date_summarized: 2026-07-18
verified_against_source: 2026-07-19
verified_against_source: 2026-07-20
tier_budget_words: 150
tags: [adaptive-agents, agent-design, meta-prompting, topos-theory, sheaf-theory, rough-fuzzy-sets, monte-carlo, llm]
entity_ledger:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -362,12 +362,21 @@ and came back with corrections.
- Released data: https://github.com/cadavid1/PCF (verified as the embedded
hyperlink behind the Abstract's "See GitHub here")
- Earlier version: Research Square (rs-6397317/v1), per the paper's header note
- Verified against source: 2026-07-19, against the arXiv v1 PDF; section, table,
and figure numbering follows that rendering
- Verified against source: 2026-07-20, against the arXiv v1 PDF; section, table,
and figure numbering follows that rendering. Prior verification: 2026-07-19
(corrections itemized below).
- Tier budget convention: 150 words of prose per tier, bracketed locators
excluded from the count. All five tiers are exactly 150 under that rule, so
density is the only variable across the chain.
- Revisions or errata noticed since: none in the source
- **Re-verification on 2026-07-20**, source-first against arXiv:2508.01581v1:
every T1–T5 claim, the entity-ledger locators, the Key-results table, the
Table 1 OLS figures, the Table 2 spline figures, the Table 3 tier
descriptives, both R² values (0.217 OLS / 0.297 spline), the three-level
tier collapse (5-star distinct; 4-star ≈ 3-star; 2-star ≈ 1-star with 1-star
marginally higher on both measures), and the absence of any
adaptable-vs-non-adaptable statistic were all reconfirmed at the source. No
discrepancies found; verification date refreshed only.
- **Corrections applied to this note on 2026-07-19**, all source-first:
1. The headline finding was misstated across all five tiers as "adaptable
agents beat static ones, but the benefit shrinks as complexity rises." The
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions index.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"schema_version": 1,
"updated": "2026-07-18",
"updated": "2026-07-20",
"repo": "https://github.com/OpenCnid/pcf-adaptive-agents",
"notes": [
{
Expand All @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
"pinned_date": "2025-08-03",
"source_license": "CC BY 4.0",
"date_summarized": "2026-07-18",
"verified_against_source": "2026-07-19",
"verified_against_source": "2026-07-20",
"tier_budget_words": 150,
"tags": ["adaptive-agents", "agent-design", "meta-prompting", "topos-theory", "sheaf-theory", "rough-fuzzy-sets", "monte-carlo", "llm"]
}
Expand Down