Skip to content

Use m for the snf matrix argument - #2475

Draft
HereAround wants to merge 1 commit into
Nemocas:masterfrom
HereAround:docs/normalize-snf-signature
Draft

Use m for the snf matrix argument#2475
HereAround wants to merge 1 commit into
Nemocas:masterfrom
HereAround:docs/normalize-snf-signature

Conversation

@HereAround

@HereAround HereAround commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This isolates the snf(A::MatElem) to snf(m::MatElem) argument rename from #2474.

The printed method signature is currently captured by an Oscar book example, so this PR is intentionally left as a draft for the next breaking release, when the corresponding book output can be updated.

Co-authored-by: Codex codex@openai.com

cc @lgoettgens

Align the documented and implementation argument name for snf with the matrix naming convention.

Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
@HereAround HereAround added breaking release notes: not needed PRs introducing changes that are wholly irrelevant to the release notes optimization Performance improvements or improved testing Previously, performance: must go faster labels Aug 2, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.22%. Comparing base (edb7d93) to head (eedd755).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2475      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.22%   88.22%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         131      131              
  Lines       33257    33257              
==========================================
- Hits        29341    29340       -1     
- Misses       3916     3917       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking optimization Performance improvements or improved testing Previously, performance: must go faster release notes: not needed PRs introducing changes that are wholly irrelevant to the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant