Skip to content

Clarify regional VNet peering limitation for Application Gateway for Containers - #128752

Open
Fabian (fzankl) wants to merge 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
fzankl:patch-5
Open

Clarify regional VNet peering limitation for Application Gateway for Containers#128752
Fabian (fzankl) wants to merge 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
fzankl:patch-5

Conversation

@fzankl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The "Regional VNet Peering" limitation currently reads:

Application Gateway for Containers deployed in a virtual network in region A and the AKS cluster nodes in a virtual network in region A isn't supported.

Taken literally, this says a deployment in region A with the cluster also in region A is unsupported, which contradicts the rest of the page. The intended statement is that the gateway and the cluster nodes must not be in different virtual networks within the same region, matching the FAQ entry further down the page ("Can I deploy Application Gateway for Containers in a separate virtual network from my AKS cluster? A: No.").

This change adds the word "separate" so the bullet reads:

Application Gateway for Containers deployed in a virtual network in region A and the AKS cluster nodes in a separate virtual network in region A isn't supported.

The wording follows the "Global VNet Peering" bullet directly below it and reuses the term "separate virtual network" already used in the FAQ section of the same article. No technical content changes.

…Containers

The "Regional VNet Peering" limitation currently reads:

> Application Gateway for Containers deployed in a virtual network in region A and the AKS cluster nodes in a virtual network in region A isn't supported.

Taken literally, this says a deployment in region A with the cluster also in region A is unsupported, which contradicts the rest of the page. The intended statement is that the gateway and the cluster nodes must not be in *different* virtual networks within the same region, matching the FAQ entry further down the page ("Can I deploy Application Gateway for Containers in a separate virtual network from my AKS cluster? A: No.").

This change adds the word "separate" so the bullet reads:

> Application Gateway for Containers deployed in a virtual network in region A and the AKS cluster nodes in a separate virtual network in region A isn't supported.

The wording follows the "Global VNet Peering" bullet directly below it and reuses the term "separate virtual network" already used in the FAQ section of the same article. No technical content changes.
@prmerger-automator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fabian (@fzankl) : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@prmerger-automator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fabian (@fzankl) : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 8a96f0b:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/application-gateway/for-containers/container-networking.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Pull request overview

Clarifies the “Regional VNet Peering” limitation wording to avoid implying that same-region/same-VNet deployments are unsupported.

Changes:

  • Updates the Regional VNet Peering bullet to specify “separate virtual network” in the same region.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread articles/application-gateway/for-containers/container-networking.md
@v-dirichards

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Michael Bender (@mbender-ms)

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator Bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Sep 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants