feat: add automations

[graphieros]

closes #474
closes #477
closes #479

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Verified Automations
  • Added three automation records to the verified list.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for agentscan ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	7fa2d76
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/agentscan/deploys/6ac4a584a992a000085cfb12
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-497--agentscan.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes	Run an agent on this branch

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[github-actions]

Reads like a person wrote it · agent-style score 3/100

Signals

Signal	Hits	Contribution
is too short to carry agent structure	1	-1.44

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: MatteoGabriele/agentscan/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 24dbc186-3874-43b4-9c65-86bb34a43b35

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between facb89f and cba237c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• data/verified-automations-list.json

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The verified automations list gains records for matbrgz, keeltrace, and dhyabi2. Each record includes account details, issue information, and approvers.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to cba23

The catalog gains three entries in the format the API serves, each listing four eligible approvers. No concrete merge-blocking issue is established; the underlying issue reactions were not independently confirmed.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to cba23

The change affects 1 system.

Changed systems: data

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Systems and components

• observed — data (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.

Before / after behavior

• observed — Modified behavior in data/verified-automations-list.json: Added the matbrgz record, including its issue details and four approvers.
• observed — Modified behavior in data/verified-automations-list.json: Added the keeltrace record, including its issue details and four approvers.
• observed — Modified behavior in data/verified-automations-list.json: Added the dhyabi2 record, including its issue details and four approvers.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Issues #474, #477, and #479 report suspected automated accounts and link supporting evidence. The PR adds dhyabi2, keeltrace, and matbrgz to data/verified-automations-list.json with their repo…
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The PR adds only the three records for accounts named in issues #474, #477, and #479. Each change has a direct connection to the linked reports. No unrelated changes appear in the whole-PR diff.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding three automation records to the verified automations list.

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[trueberryless]

Not sure why we need to do this manually now, but this looks good to me ✅

[graphieros]

Not sure why we need to do this manually now, but this looks good to me ✅

Just doing it for the boss who is AFK^^

[MatteoGabriele]

Not sure why we need to do this manually now, but this looks good to me ✅

I've always done this manually on my local machine.