feat: restructure search section#586
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
| @@ -5,21 +5,26 @@ | |||
| "id": "337f5e01-9946-465a-8657-e4153fbac541", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
|
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB zacdezgeo commented on 2026-06-23T18:02:31Z not sure why this got included in the changes... hrodmn commented on 2026-06-23T19:16:16Z I don't know why the diff isn't showing very well here, but I just added a note to redirect users to to the collection search stage if they are still looking for collections |
| @@ -5,15 +5,17 @@ | |||
| "id": "a66708a3", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should we remove dates in the notebooks? maybe worth tracking in a separate issue.
Reply via ReviewNB
zacdezgeo
left a comment
zacdezgeo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some small comments posted via notebookNB, but great work Henry. I like how you reworded a lot of the text blocks, and the structure of the notebook is easy to follow.
|
🤔 I'm not sure either View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
|
I don't know why the diff isn't showing very well here, but I just added a note to redirect users to to the collection search stage if they are still looking for collections View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
2 participants
These changes reflect the latest recommended path for searching for collections and items/granules:
While working on this I noticed that we don't reference earthaccess at all for doing granule searches so I filed #585 as a follow-up.
Resolves #584