research: add SYM-ARCH-002A4 adversarial construct-validity controls - #60
Draft
Tristan-Stoltz-ERC wants to merge 12 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds SYM-ARCH-002A4 adversarial construct-validity controls from issue #55.
This is a draft stack on #59 (
research/sym-arch-002a3-validity-v1). It consumes A3's generated-dataset/oracle validity layer and asks a stricter question before any architecture score counts as evidence:If yes, the result is
INCONCLUSIVE_BENCHMARK, not an architecture win/loss.No architecture capability result is produced by this PR.
Train-only shortcut controls
A4 reports and gates:
The single-feature model chooses its feature using training accuracy only. Evaluation labels are used only for final scoring.
Fitted shortcut models consume learner-visible
featuresonly.example_id,support_tags, support metadata, and oracle outputs are excluded from fitted model inputs.Finite-sample resolution gate
A4 computes the 95% Wilson upper accuracy bound for a fair Bernoulli classifier at the actual evaluation-set size.
If ordinary chance uncertainty can reach the tighter frozen shortcut ceiling, the benchmark is automatically
INCONCLUSIVE_BENCHMARKand must increase evaluation support.This intentionally catches coarse held-outs such as four-item evaluation splits before anyone treats a one-item difference as a precise architectural effect.
Fail-closed contract
A4 returns only:
passed;inconclusive_benchmark.It becomes inconclusive when:
A benchmark failure is never converted into a negative architecture claim.
Shuffled-relation controls
Training labels are deterministically permuted while preserving prevalence. At least four unique frozen shuffle seeds are required. A4 records both mean and maximum accuracy across shuffles; v1 gates on the mean to avoid making validity hinge on one lucky permutation.
Tests
Focused tests cover:
Threshold hygiene
The
0.80ceilings used by unit tests are synthetic fixtures only. They are not scientific defaults.Claim-bearing use must freeze before result inspection:
CI
Adds
SYM-ARCH-002A4 Construct Validitywith:The unrelated stale
LoopTrialResult::cycle_rewardfixture repair has already been propagated identically across #53/#57/#58/#59/A4 so this stack does not reintroduce that known compile failure. It does not appear in this PR's scientific diff.Wording ceiling
A pass supports only:
It does not establish that the benchmark is universally shortcut-free, and it does not establish Symthaea superiority.
Depends on #59. Tracks #55.