Relicense azphalt from MIT to Apache-2.0 - #226
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Root LICENSE is the canonical Apache License 2.0 text, with a NOTICE.
Every workspace package's "license" is now Apache-2.0, except the
create-azphalt templates, whose field is the creator's own project's
default. README, the store's terms, the specs that cite the standard's
licence, and docs/RATIONALE.md § Licensing (now "Why Apache-2.0": the
explicit patent grant for a standard others implement) follow.
Also splits .changeset/publish-endpoint.md: it mixed private apps with
the published @azphalt/azdk, which Changesets v3 refuses ("mixed
changeset"), and would have failed the release.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QwYWVPse8spRrfMMcuTJPv
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Reviewer's GuideRelicenses azphalt’s repository and published packages from MIT to Apache-2.0, adds the required NOTICE and documentation/metadata updates, preserves creator-selected extension licenses, and splits a mixed Changesets entry so release validation passes. Flow diagram for Apache-2.0 licensing metadata and release validationflowchart TD
Relicense["Relicense repository and packages\nMIT → Apache-2.0"] --> Files["Update LICENSE and add NOTICE"]
Files --> Metadata["Update package license fields"]
Metadata --> Docs["Update README, specs, terms, and rationale"]
Docs --> Changesets["Add Apache-2 changeset\nminor bumps for published packages"]
Changesets --> Split["Separate repository publish changeset\nfrom private storefront apps"]
Split --> Status["changeset status passes"]
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Signed-off-by: Az <103241502+HereLiesAz@users.noreply.github.com>
HereLiesAz
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 27, 2026 06:02
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @HereLiesAz, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days.
You can request another review in 1 day and 17 hours by commenting @sourcery-ai review. Upgrade to get a review now.
This was referenced Sep 27, 2026
This branch had an error being deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Relicenses azphalt from MIT to Apache-2.0, as requested. Apache-2.0 keeps every freedom MIT gave and adds an explicit patent grant plus patent retaliation. For a standard that other hosts implement, that grant is the point.
LICENSEis now the canonical Apache License 2.0 text, taken from apache.org. A newNOTICEholds the copyright line and says that extensions keep their own licences."license"field is nowApache-2.0. The exception is thecreate-azphalttemplates: their field is the default for a creator's own project, and the scaffolder still asks which licence they want..changeset/apache-2.mdgives a minor bump to each published package.spec/extension-manifest.mdandspec/marketplace-integrity.md, mirrored intodocs/specs;create-azphaltreadme;docs/RATIONALE.md§ Licensing, which now argues for Apache-2.0 over MIT and EPL.Also fixed:
.changeset/publish-endpoint.md(from #223) mixed private apps with the published@azphalt/azdk. Changesets v3 refuses that as a "mixed changeset", so it would have failed the next release. I split it into two files, andchangeset statusnow passes.Validation
pnpm install --frozen-lockfilepasses; the lockfile is unchanged.changeset statuspasses.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01QwYWVPse8spRrfMMcuTJPv
Generated by Claude Code
Summary by Sourcery
Adopt Apache License 2.0 across the azphalt standard and its published packages while preserving independent extension licensing.
Bug Fixes:
Enhancements:
Documentation:
Chores: