Skip to content

make infused seed available for EIG (once again) - #7796

Draft
fehling135 wants to merge 3 commits into
GTNewHorizons:masterfrom
fehling135:infused-seed-for-EIG
Draft

make infused seed available for EIG (once again)#7796
fehling135 wants to merge 3 commits into
GTNewHorizons:masterfrom
fehling135:infused-seed-for-EIG

Conversation

@fehling135

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

There had been a PR with same topic: #5245. But the author cannot be contacted so I raised this PR again.
Infused seeds take 8 slots each as discussed under the former PR:
image
image
image
Ordo and Perditio tendency would affect the output. Ordo increases output amount and Perditio allows seed duplication, just as seeds performed in real farm. Duplicated seeds have same parameter with its parent. Other tendencies does not affect.
image
But the infused seeds look still too powerful. Maybe more nerfs are needed.

Checklist

  • I have tested this PR in DevEnv
  • I have tested this PR in Fullpack
  • This PR is in compliance with the GTNH AI Policy
  • This PR requires another PR in order to merge

@fehling135
fehling135 requested a review from a team August 18, 2026 19:38
@fehling135 fehling135 added the Affects Balance Change affecting balance. Requires admin approval before merging. label Aug 18, 2026
}

private static boolean isInfusedSeedItem(ItemStack seed) {
return seed.getItem()

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why use reflection instead of instanceof

@UltraProdigy UltraProdigy left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The balance considerations here are unclear and the full implications (drop wise and rate wise) should be documented and audited before we consider this feature.

Also given the current timeframe and a lack of testing period for potential oversights freezing this until 2.10 would be wise.

@boubou19 boubou19 added the Ongoing Freeze - Do NOT Merge For PRs submitted close to a release that must wait for the next dev cycle to merge. label Aug 18, 2026
@fehling135
fehling135 marked this pull request as draft August 19, 2026 04:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Affects Balance Change affecting balance. Requires admin approval before merging. Ongoing Freeze - Do NOT Merge For PRs submitted close to a release that must wait for the next dev cycle to merge.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants