Trusted architecture context for AI agents. AIP builds an evidence-backed model of your software architecture from declared specs and real runtime telemetry, and exposes it through three read-only MCP tools — dependency and drift answers carry qualified, evidence-linked architecture claims, while evidence drill-down resolves their provenance at the same graph snapshot.
Five-Minute Demo · MCP Tools · How AIP Works · Evaluation · Boundaries · Documentation · Research Landscape
Requires Docker (with Compose), curl and jq. No LLM API key — nothing on this path calls a
model:
git clone https://github.com/michaelegner/architecture-intelligence-platform.git
cd architecture-intelligence-platform
cp .env.example .env
examples/runtime-demo/mcp-demo.shThe script starts AIP + Neo4j + an OTel Collector, imports the bundled example architecture, seeds
one timestamp-frozen batch of runtime telemetry, then drives tools/list →
get_architecture_drift → get_evidence over plain HTTP/JSON-RPC — the same path any MCP client
speaking 2026-07-28 would take.
Asking get_architecture_drift about order-service returns two findings:
| Dependency | Qualification | What it means |
|---|---|---|
LegacyPricingService |
OBSERVED_ONLY |
A real dependency, seen in live traffic, that nothing declares |
unused-q |
NOT_OBSERVED_IN_WINDOW |
Declared in asyncapi.yaml, not seen in this window — deliberately not reported as "unused" or "dead" |
ProductService and PaymentService (via payment-q) are CONFIRMED — declared and
observed — and correctly don't appear at all: drift returns discrepancies, never matches.
get_service_dependencies is the tool that lists all four. Alongside the two claims the answer
carries a limitations entry: AIP declining to name a consumer for unused-q that it cannot
evidence. Each claim's evidence_refs then resolve through get_evidence, at the same
snapshot_id, to the asyncapi.yaml that declared one and the OpenTelemetry window that observed
the other.
The full JSON both calls return
get_architecture_drift for order-service, exactly as the demo prints it — its jq flattens
snapshot.snapshot_id and keeps the fields that matter here, rather than showing the full envelope:
{
"snapshot_id": "aip:snapshot:v1:685a34157b6842b00d7130b8490df63060c3d80871c2ed6f56cd9206e62342d8",
"outcome": "PARTIAL",
"limitations": [
{
"code": "UNRESOLVED_IDENTITY",
"message": "queue:unused-q has no single evidenced consumer service; retained as the direct queue target rather than guessed.",
"claim_ids": ["aip:claim:v1:ca0dd73ba391552edd6d2cc06cddd919a8af97f362cdb47392e78325219fd612"]
}
],
"claims": [
{
"dependency": "unused-q",
"via": "unused-q",
"qualification": "NOT_OBSERVED_IN_WINDOW",
"evidence_refs": ["evidence:asyncapi:order-service"]
},
{
"dependency": "LegacyPricingService",
"via": "GET /pricing/{sku}",
"qualification": "OBSERVED_ONLY",
"evidence_refs": ["evidence:otel:demo:2026-08-26:bfae54276215"]
}
]
}Feeding those evidence_refs back into get_evidence at the same snapshot_id returns the
provenance behind each claim:
[
{
"id": "evidence:asyncapi:order-service",
"evidence_type": "DECLARED",
"source_type": "ASYNCAPI",
"source_locator": "examples/order-service/asyncapi.yaml"
},
{
"id": "evidence:otel:demo:2026-08-26:bfae54276215",
"evidence_type": "OBSERVED",
"source_type": "OPENTELEMETRY",
"source_locator": "opentelemetry"
}
]Because every seeded span is frozen rather than clock-derived, two clean runs produce the same
qualifications and the same snapshot_id. Run examples/runtime-demo/mcp-demo.sh --down to tear it
back down. For the step-by-step version — every curl spelled out, with what each answer means —
see examples/runtime-demo/hero-demo.md.
Find dependencies nobody wrote down. Real traffic reveals calls that exist in no spec, manifest
or diagram. AIP surfaces them as OBSERVED_ONLY, with the observation window that saw them —
OrderService -> LegacyPricingService in the demo above.
Check whether the architecture you declared is the one that's running. Drift is reported per dependency and in both directions — declared but not observed, observed but never declared — each qualified rather than asserted.
Give a coding agent context it can cite. Three read-only MCP tools hand an agent direct dependencies, drift and provenance bound to one graph snapshot, so it can tell a fact from a guess — and so it can never write to the model it is reading from.
An agent changing a service needs to know what that service actually talks to. Today it gets that from the two least reliable sources available: architecture documentation that drifted from reality months ago, and its own plausible inference from whatever code happened to fit in the context window. Both sound equally confident, and neither lets the agent tell a fact from a guess.
AIP answers that question from evidence that already exists and is already maintained as part of normal development — OpenAPI/AsyncAPI specs, a minimal manifest for the one thing they can't express (who calls what), and, optionally, real OpenTelemetry traffic. Dependency and drift answers state which evidence supports each claim, whether runtime observation agrees with what was declared, and what AIP could not establish: a dependency that was never observed is reported as not observed, never as absent, and an unresolved identity is never guessed. Evidence drill-down resolves those evidence references at the same snapshot without creating new architecture claims.
AIP may help agents reason about architecture, but an agent must never become the source of architectural truth. —
ROADMAP.md's v0.4 principle
⭐ If you find this repository helpful, please consider giving it a ⭐ here on GitHub (click the star button in the top right corner). It's a quick way to show support for this openly available code. ⭐
v0.4.0 exposes the validated architecture model at /mcp (MCP protocol 2026-07-28) as exactly
three read-only tools:
| Tool | Answers |
|---|---|
get_service_dependencies |
What does this service directly depend on, and is each dependency confirmed by runtime observation? |
get_architecture_drift |
Which of those direct dependencies disagree with what was declared — observed but undocumented, or declared but not observed in this window? |
get_evidence |
What is the actual provenance behind those claims — which spec file, manifest, or observation window? |
All three perform zero graph writes and need no LLM API key — the whole surface is deterministic —
and none of them will invent, guess, or upgrade an unresolved fact: insufficient evidence comes back
as a limitations entry, never as silence.
What each answer contains, what it is bound to, and what the surface deliberately does not do:
Boundaries below. Full reference, including the exact JSON-RPC call shape:
docs/mcp.md.
To run the whole platform (REST API, Service Explorer, MCP endpoint) rather than just the demo:
cp .env.example .env
docker compose up.env.example's NEO4J_PASSWORD is a fixed local-only default (change-me-local) — fine for
trying this out, never for anything reachable outside your machine.
Then open http://localhost:8000. config.yaml already points at this repo's examples/ fixture
services, so POST /api/import works immediately against them. See
docs/development.md for running locally without Docker, the test suite, and
linting.
Evidence in, qualified architecture facts out:
OpenAPI · AsyncAPI · architecture.yaml (declared)
OpenTelemetry traces (observed)
-> canonical model -> evidence-backed graph -> qualified claims -> MCP tools / REST / UI
Hand-maintained architecture documentation drifts because nothing forces it to agree with the system. AIP never stores an architecture fact without the evidence that produced it, so declared and observed signals stay distinguishable instead of collapsing into one undifferentiated "truth".
Every relation in the graph carries evidence, and its evidence can be DECLARED (from a spec/
manifest), OBSERVED (from real telemetry), or both. That's what turns into a status:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
CONFIRMED |
Declared and observed |
OBSERVED_ONLY |
Observed, but never declared anywhere — an undocumented real dependency |
NOT_OBSERVED_IN_WINDOW |
Declared, but not seen in this window — never "obsolete"/"unused"/"dead", just not observed yet or here |
Removing a stale declaration never deletes a relation that still has observed evidence — it degrades
CONFIRMED to OBSERVED_ONLY instead. See docs/graph-model.md for the
exact invariant this guarantees and why it matters. The dependency and drift MCP tools above return
exactly these qualifications; nothing is upgraded or smoothed over on the way out.
A modular Python monolith (a single FastAPI process); Neo4j is the only external persistent
dependency. Ingestion is a strictly staged pipeline — scan -> parse -> source-validate -> map to canonical model -> canonical-validate -> reconcile/diff -> transactional graph write — where a
service's import either fully succeeds or is entirely discarded, never left partial. Source adapters
never write to Neo4j directly; they all map into one shared Canonical Model first. Full details,
including the graph/evidence model and every API route: docs/architecture.md.
Five fixed, parameterized Cypher analyses over declared architecture (queue senders/consumers,
orphan queues, mixed-architecture blast radius) plus five over declared-vs-observed runtime data
(what was actually observed, what's confirmed, what's observed-only, what's declared-only, and
per-service telemetry coverage). None of these involve the LLM — see
docs/analyses.md for the full list and what each one answers.
Architecture intelligence for agents
- ✓ Three read-only MCP tools over one
/mcpendpoint, with closed input/output schemas - ✓ One
ArchitectureAnswerenvelope for every tool — qualified claims/evidence references on dependency and drift answers, resolved evidence records onget_evidence - ✓ Snapshot-bound tool flow: claim-producing answers and evidence drill-down stay on one graph state
- ✓ Explicit observation context (environment + time window) on every runtime-sensitive answer;
get_evidenceis intentionally observation-context-free - ✓ Evidence drill-down to sanitized provenance — no raw span/trace payload, headers, or secrets
- ✓ Closed six-code limitation vocabulary (e.g.
UNRESOLVED_IDENTITY,INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE) — non-observation is never returned as absence, and an unresolved destination is never guessed
Evidence sources
- ✓ OpenAPI ingestion
- ✓ AsyncAPI queue topology
- ✓ Architecture manifest support (the one place declared REST callers come from)
- ✓ OpenTelemetry runtime discovery of undeclared operations, services and queues
- ✓ Cross-batch HTTP correlation (a CLIENT and SERVER span arriving in separate OTLP requests still correlate to one observed dependency)
- ✓ Partial-instrumentation tolerance (a stable one-sided observation still counts, an unreliable one never gets guessed)
Reconciliation and qualification
- ✓ Evidence / provenance on every fact, independently for declared and observed evidence
- ✓ Declared vs. observed reconciliation and architecture drift detection
- ✓ Telemetry coverage qualification for negative findings
- ✓ Atomic per-service reimport — a partial import is never left in the graph
Analysis and queries
- ✓ Deterministic dependency analyses (queue senders/consumers, orphan queues)
- ✓ Architecture blast radius (mixed sync + async traversal)
- ✓ Semantic Cypher validation (a hard allowlist gate, not an LLM guardrail)
- ✓ Natural-language architecture queries — deterministic where possible, validated read-only Cypher otherwise, and entirely optional
Platform
- ✓ Technology-independent Canonical Model with stable, repository-independent entity IDs
- ✓ Neo4j architecture knowledge graph
- ✓ Service Explorer UI showing declared and observed dependencies side by side
See docs/opentelemetry.md for what the CLIENT_SERVER/CLIENT_ONLY/
SERVER_ONLY/UNRESOLVED correlation modes above actually mean.
The bundled examples/ fixture is a small, fully synthetic four-service landscape:
unused-q (a sender with no consumer) and unknown-producer-q (a consumer with no known sender) are
included specifically to exercise the orphan-queue analyses. POST /api/import loads all of it in
one call.
Two independent evaluation suites prove AIP's output against hand-authored, independently frozen ground truth — never generated from AIP's own output — with deterministic PASS/FAIL:
uv run python -m evaluation run # ten scenarios over declared/observed relation facts (v0.2)
uv run python -m evaluation answers # three-tool ArchitectureAnswer envelope suite (I1.4, generalized by I3.3)answers compares the complete ArchitectureAnswer — claims, evidence references, snapshot and
observation-context identity, limitations — against literal frozen expectations across all three
tools (get_service_dependencies, get_architecture_drift, get_evidence) and emits a
machine-readable JSON result to
evaluation/architecture_answers/results/architecture-answers-evaluation-result.json. The original
I1-only artifact, evaluation/architecture_answers/results/i1-evaluation-result.json, is kept as
the immutable historical record docs/specifications/0.4.0/i1-completion-record.md cites by
SHA-256 — it is no longer written by answers, only the generalized file is. No LLM provider key
is required — neither suite touches the natural-language query layer. See
evaluation/README.md for the full scenario lists, ground-truth formats,
and failure-report examples.
POST /v1/traces is AIP's OTLP/HTTP ingestion boundary. It resolves incoming spans against whatever
is already declared in the graph and persists observed facts and evidence alongside the declared
ones — never inventing a fact it can't trace back to real telemetry.
AIP is an additional telemetry consumer, not the primary observability backend. It must never be the only thing an OTel Collector forwards to, and its own availability must never affect an application's normal observability:
Failure isolation, buffering, and retry behavior belong in the Collector/deployment configuration —
/v1/traces does no buffering or retry of its own, by design. Full attribute allowlist, correlation
modes, and coverage-qualification model: docs/opentelemetry.md.
Where the five-minute demo freezes its telemetry for reproducibility, this one generates live traffic continuously:
docker compose -f docker-compose.demo.yml up --buildBrings up architecture-intelligence + neo4j (as above) plus an otel-collector service and a
traffic-generator that emits realistic synthetic OTLP traces for the examples/ fixture topology
every few seconds (see examples/runtime-demo/traffic_generator.py's docstring for why this repo
generates spans directly rather than running real HTTP services). The Collector forwards every batch
to AIP's /v1/traces and, in parallel, to a debug exporter — standing in for "an additional
tracing backend" in the topology above.
Once it's running, POST /api/import to declare the fixture topology, then watch
GET /api/runtime/relations?environment=demo fill in with OBSERVED/CONFIRMED relations as the
generator's traffic lands — a live demonstration of the DECLARED + OBSERVED -> CONFIRMED and, on a
later reimport with a declaration removed, -> OBSERVED_ONLY transition described above. The
generator also emits an undeclared OrderService -> LegacyPricingService call (surfacing as
OBSERVED_ONLY on its own, with no reimport needed) and periodically splits one CLIENT/SERVER pair
across two OTLP requests to demonstrate cross-batch correlation. See
examples/runtime-demo/README.md for the full step-by-step
walkthrough — every state (CONFIRMED, OBSERVED_ONLY, NOT_OBSERVED_IN_WINDOW) and the
reconciliation scenario, each with exact curl commands and expected results.
The same states are visible at http://localhost:8000/ — the Service Explorer shows declared vs. observed side by side:
http://localhost:8000/query answers questions like "Which dependencies are observed but undocumented?" without needing an LLM configured.
POST /api/query answers a plain-language question either by routing it to an existing
deterministic analysis (above) or, if it doesn't recognize the question, by generating Cypher that
must pass a strict read-only allowlist validator before it ever touches Neo4j. The LLM never holds
write credentials and its Cypher is always shown back alongside the answer for traceability. Fully
optional — the platform works completely without any LLM provider configured, and no MCP tool
depends on it. See docs/semantic-validation.md.
What the three MCP tools return, and what they deliberately don't.
One envelope. Every tool returns the same ArchitectureAnswer (schema_version, producer,
tool, outcome, snapshot, observation_context, data, claims, evidence_refs,
limitations), validated against a closed, published JSON Schema. Dependency and drift answers
populate claims/evidence_refs, while get_evidence resolves evidence records into data and
intentionally leaves those top-level arrays empty.
Current state, not history. Every answer is bound to one stable graph snapshot identity — a
fingerprint of the current graph state, so two answers can be read against one immutable state.
There is no historical or point-in-time query surface, and a snapshot_id that is no longer the
current one is refused with a SNAPSHOT_NOT_AVAILABLE limitation rather than answered from stale
data.
Explicit observation context. The runtime-sensitive dependency and drift tools carry an
environment and time window on every answer, while get_evidence is intentionally
observation-context-free and requires an explicit snapshot_id.
Direct dependencies only. One hop — no transitive traversal, and no generic Cypher or graph query surface behind the tools.
One protocol path. The endpoint speaks the 2026-07-28 per-request envelope only — there is
no legacy initialize session handshake, so a client negotiating an older protocol version is
rejected rather than quietly served on a different path.
Local or trusted network. As with the rest of AIP, /mcp is built for a local or
trusted-network posture; it is not hardened for direct public-internet exposure — see
docs/security-model.md.
docs/mcp.md— the three read-only MCP tools for AI agents, and a runnable hero-demo walkthroughdocs/architecture.md— pipeline, API surfacedocs/canonical-model.md— entities and deterministic idsdocs/graph-model.md— relations, fact/evidence invariants, observedPROVIDESdocs/evidence.md— provenance, theEvidencenode, correlation modesdocs/ingestion.md— the three declared source adaptersdocs/analyses.md— A1-A5 and O1-O5docs/semantic-validation.md— the NL query pipelinedocs/opentelemetry.md— runtime observation, attribute allowlist, coverageevaluation/README.md— the deterministic evaluation suite: scenarios, ground-truth format, running it, and reading a failure reportreal_world_validation/README.mdanddocs/real-world-validation/README.md— the v0.3 real-world validation contract: finding vocabulary,expected.yamlshape, dossier structuredocs/configuration.md— every setting and its defaultdocs/security-model.md— trust boundariesdocs/development.md— local dev, tests, lintingdocs/adapter-development.md— extending AIP with a new sourcedocs/architecture-review-0.4.0.md— post-v0.4.0architecture review: what held up, four structural findings, measured read costdocs/adr/— Architecture Decision Records: why Neo4j, why a Canonical Model, why the LLM is read-only and never a source of truth, and moredocs/specifications/— the original design specifications, as a traceable history of how the platform got heredocs/landscape.md— research landscape: formal foundations, adjacent platforms, agent context, architectural intent, governance, and verificationROADMAP.md/CHANGELOG.md— where this is headed, and what's shipped so far
See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, test/lint/format commands, and the
adapter contribution guide. Questions and ideas go in Discussions; bugs and
feature requests use the issue templates. Security vulnerabilities should never be reported as
public issues — see SECURITY.md. This project follows the
Contributor Covenant.
Latest release:
v0.4.0
— Trusted Architecture Context for Agents.
Today AIP ingests OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, architecture manifests and OpenTelemetry traces into an
evidence-backed knowledge graph; reconciles declared against observed architecture; runs ten
deterministic analyses over the result; and exposes it to agents through three read-only,
snapshot-bound MCP tools. Every part of that path is deterministic and independently qualified: two
frozen evaluation suites, real-world validation against Quarkus Super Heroes and Apache Airflow, and
a published-artifact verification per release —
docs/release-validation/v0.4.0-post-release-verification.md
is the most recent.
Pre-1.0: the REST/MCP surface, Graph Schema, Canonical Model, Adapter SPI and configuration format
may still change on a minor version bump. See CHANGELOG.md for what shipped in
each release and ROADMAP.md for what's next — v0.5 (Broader Architecture Discovery).
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See LICENSE. Third-party dependency licenses: THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES.md.

