Conversation
…iamondLightSource/dodal into update_dodal_ophyd_async_v0.17a1
|
I'm going to make a new release of |
|
Where are we up to with the new release @shihab-dls? It would be really good to get this working so that we can test the new |
e3b8f9f to
914c03a
Compare
914c03a to
ce542ed
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1979 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.11% 99.05% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 328 325 -3
Lines 12774 12662 -112
==========================================
- Hits 12661 12542 -119
- Misses 113 120 +7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Codecov seems wrong to me, but this PR should be ready for a review now. |
…iamondLightSource/dodal into update_dodal_ophyd_async_v0.17a1
|
I've tested a bunch of beamlines dodal connects to see if this change breaks beamlines adsim b01_1 b16 b21 Note: Still fails without this change i03 Note: still fails without this change i11 NOTE: everything passes without this change, the above us wrong and broken by this change. i13-1 i18 NOTE: dodal connect passes for all devices without this change, something in this change broke it. i19-2 Note: without this change, the dodal connect error is i22 NOTE: without this change the above connects, something in this change broke it. i23 i24 Note: different connect error without this change p38 p45 p99 training_rig There is still some stuff to fix... |
|
So in summary, changes that need to be made in ophyd-async in a new alpha release @coretl @shihab-dls from what I've spotted so far: i18, 122 Then for i11 Again, this seems to be because |
Actually, this doesn't seem possible because the API of |
Thanks @oliwenmandiamond! It's expected that the
I think for the tetramms we can just change it back. For i11 it looks like the enum on |
Just checked this on the beamline, we're connecting to everything that we expect to connect to ( |
WIP
OOO until 1/4/26