Skip to content

docs: add missing sections to table of contents - #181

Open
Mohit-001-hash wants to merge 1 commit into
DevanshuTripathi:mainfrom
Mohit-001-hash:fix-toc-missing-sections
Open

docs: add missing sections to table of contents#181
Mohit-001-hash wants to merge 1 commit into
DevanshuTripathi:mainfrom
Mohit-001-hash:fix-toc-missing-sections

Conversation

@Mohit-001-hash

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📝 Summary

This PR fixes a critical omission in the README.md file. Several major sections—Template Rendering, Performance, and Philosophy—were missing from the Table of Contents. I have updated the TOC to ensure all document sections are listed in the correct order so users can accurately navigate the framework's features.

🔗 Linked Issue

Closes #None


🔄 Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • ✨ New feature
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • ♻️ Code refactor
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • 🎨 UI/UX change

🛠️ What Was Changed

  • Added the following missing sections to the Table of Contents in README.md:
    • [Template Rendering](#template-rendering)
    • [Performance](#performance)
    • [Philosophy](#philosophy)
  • Verified the order matches the actual document structure.

🧪 Testing & Verification

  • Visually verified the Markdown rendering to ensure the Table of Contents anchor links correctly navigate to their respective sections.

📋 Checklist

  • My branch is up to date with main
  • My commit messages are descriptive and clear
  • I have tested the Markdown rendering locally

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Mohit-001-hash is attempting to deploy a commit to the Devanshu Tripathi's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@DevanshuTripathi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Which summer of code are you a part of?

@Mohit-001-hash

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Girlscript summer of code

@Mohit-001-hash

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

(gssoc)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants