Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 18, 2026. It is now read-only.

Migrate k8s-datadog-agent-ops to the ddoghq GitHub org - #317

Open
FlorentClarret wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
florent.clarret/kdao-ddoghq
Open

FlorentClarret wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
florent.clarret/kdao-ddoghq

Conversation

@FlorentClarret

@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR do?

Migrate k8s-datadog-agent-ops to the ddoghq GitHub org

Motivation

What inspired you to submit this pull request?

Additional Notes

Anything else we should know when reviewing?

Describe your test plan

Write there any instructions and details you may have to test your PR.

@FlorentClarret
FlorentClarret requested review from a team as code owners September 16, 2026 07:21
@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret added this to the v0.10 milestone Sep 16, 2026
@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret added the tooling Issue linked to the repository tooling label Sep 16, 2026
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pipelines

⚠️ Warnings

❌ Your PR has failed checks. Please review the issues below and take necessary action before merging.

🚦 3 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/extendeddaemonset | Service catalog metadata validation — 🔧 Needs a code fix, caused by this PR

View more details · View in GitLab

pull request linter | Check Milestone

View more details · View in GitHub Actions

pull request linter | build

View more details · View in GitHub Actions

ℹ️ Info

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 37.19% (+0.00%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 0f3a1bd | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Service catalog file validation

Service catalog validation failed — this check is advisory and does not block merges.

Validation failures:

  • service.datadog.yaml
    • Unexpected error checking if there are duplicate files service named: extendeddaemonset): child workflow execution error (type: servicecatalog.ServiceCatalog_ValidateDuplicateServiceMetadata, workflowID: 01a0a918-7883-7bf3-a9b6-267ee12b77b9_20, runID: 01a0a918-7b29-7911-aec8-1f907491e34d, initiatedEventID: 20, startedEventID: 21): the GitHub owner in service definition URL "https://github.com/ManuelPalenzuelaDD/extendeddaemonset/blob/main/service.datadog.yaml" is "ManuelPalenzuelaDD", only repos under owners [DataDog ddoghq] are supported

How to solve it? Click here for details.
How to run the validation locally? Click here for details.
Any questions? Reach out to #sre-core-observability.

@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 37.96%. Comparing base (37a6ec2) to head (0f3a1bd).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #317   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.96%   37.96%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        3856     3856           
=======================================
  Hits         1464     1464           
  Misses       2276     2276           
  Partials      116      116           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 37.96% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 37a6ec2...0f3a1bd. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

tooling Issue linked to the repository tooling

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants