Skip to content

revert(perf): retire unmeasured safe_source_size micro-optimization - #560

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
bolt/optimize-safe-source-size-6950287957220464868
Closed

revert(perf): retire unmeasured safe_source_size micro-optimization#560
seonghobae wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
bolt/optimize-safe-source-size-6950287957220464868

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

최종 판정

이 PR의 유효 변경은 safe_source_size()Path(source).stat().st_sizeos.stat(source).st_size로 바꾸고 이를 성능 개선으로 문서화하는 것이었습니다. 단위 테스트 통과는 의미 동등성 근거일 뿐이며, PR에 적힌 3–5배 수치는 representative/right-cleared product workload의 end-to-end latency, p95, allocation/heap·GC 또는 buyer-visible 효과를 입증하지 못했습니다.

따라서 측정되지 않은 micro-optimization을 제품 변경으로 유지하지 않습니다. protected main@47c6fd27de13b0da37a7db64697b869941909351media_shrinker.py, CHANGELOG.md, .jules/bolt.md blob을 ordinary non-force descendant 816ee1ffc92f27553e2b3481a6c93f3bd656bfdb에서 정확히 복원했습니다.

Fresh compare 결과는 ahead_by=6, behind_by=0, files=[]입니다. 즉 현재 branch에는 protected base 대비 semantic/test/fixture/contract/evidence delta가 남아 있지 않습니다. 이 확인을 근거로 no-valid-delta 예외로 unmerged Close합니다.

동일 최적화를 다시 제안하려면 실제 safe_source_size 호출 분포를 반영한 right-cleared workload에서 protected base와 semantic equivalence를 확인하고, 동일 Python/OS/filesystem/hardware 조건의 median·p95 wall time, CPU, allocation/heap·GC와 batch-level end-to-end 영향까지 함께 제시해야 합니다. noise 수준이면 제품 변경으로 채택하지 않습니다.

Force push, destructive rebase, gate weakening, self-approval, synthetic status 또는 no-op retrigger는 사용하지 않았습니다.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 6336f009-53ae-4af1-812a-f0eacd908f72

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 47c6fd2 and fada803.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .jules/bolt.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • media_shrinker.py

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

safe_source_sizePath.stat() 대신 os.stat()을 사용하도록 변경되었습니다. 기존 OSError 예외 처리는 유지되었습니다. 변경 사항과 성능 학습 내용이 문서에 기록되었습니다.

Changes

파일 크기 조회 최적화

Layer / File(s) Summary
safe_source_size 조회 방식 변경
media_shrinker.py, CHANGELOG.md, .jules/bolt.md
safe_source_sizeos.stat(source).st_size를 사용합니다. OSError 발생 시 0을 반환하는 기존 동작은 유지됩니다. 변경 내용과 os.stat() 성능 측정 결과가 문서에 추가되었습니다.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 816ee

The optimization introduces no confirmed runtime or merge-blocking risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed 제목은 safe_source_size의 파일 크기 조회 성능 최적화라는 주요 변경 사항을 정확히 설명합니다. 변경 대상 함수와 최적화 목적이 명확합니다.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. (2 skipped: 2 …
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch bolt/optimize-safe-source-size-6950287957220464868

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

seonghobae and others added 5 commits September 10, 2026 21:28
Restore the protected-base implementation and documentation. The PR provides unit-test equivalence but no representative end-to-end latency, allocation, or buyer-visible evidence for the claimed 3–5x improvement, so the optimization is not retained as a product delta.
@seonghobae seonghobae changed the title ⚡ Bolt: safe_source_size 함수의 파일 크기 조회 성능 최적화 revert(perf): retire unmeasured safe_source_size micro-optimization Sep 10, 2026
@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Sep 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant