revert(perf): retire unmeasured safe_source_size micro-optimization - #560
revert(perf): retire unmeasured safe_source_size micro-optimization#560seonghobae wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
Changes파일 크기 조회 최적화
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The optimization introduces no confirmed runtime or merge-blocking risk. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Restore the protected-base implementation and documentation. The PR provides unit-test equivalence but no representative end-to-end latency, allocation, or buyer-visible evidence for the claimed 3–5x improvement, so the optimization is not retained as a product delta.
최종 판정
이 PR의 유효 변경은
safe_source_size()의Path(source).stat().st_size를os.stat(source).st_size로 바꾸고 이를 성능 개선으로 문서화하는 것이었습니다. 단위 테스트 통과는 의미 동등성 근거일 뿐이며, PR에 적힌 3–5배 수치는 representative/right-cleared product workload의 end-to-end latency, p95, allocation/heap·GC 또는 buyer-visible 효과를 입증하지 못했습니다.따라서 측정되지 않은 micro-optimization을 제품 변경으로 유지하지 않습니다. protected
main@47c6fd27de13b0da37a7db64697b869941909351의media_shrinker.py,CHANGELOG.md,.jules/bolt.mdblob을 ordinary non-force descendant816ee1ffc92f27553e2b3481a6c93f3bd656bfdb에서 정확히 복원했습니다.Fresh compare 결과는
ahead_by=6,behind_by=0,files=[]입니다. 즉 현재 branch에는 protected base 대비 semantic/test/fixture/contract/evidence delta가 남아 있지 않습니다. 이 확인을 근거로 no-valid-delta 예외로 unmerged Close합니다.동일 최적화를 다시 제안하려면 실제
safe_source_size호출 분포를 반영한 right-cleared workload에서 protected base와 semantic equivalence를 확인하고, 동일 Python/OS/filesystem/hardware 조건의 median·p95 wall time, CPU, allocation/heap·GC와 batch-level end-to-end 영향까지 함께 제시해야 합니다. noise 수준이면 제품 변경으로 채택하지 않습니다.Force push, destructive rebase, gate weakening, self-approval, synthetic status 또는 no-op retrigger는 사용하지 않았습니다.