Skip to content

🎨 Palette: 빈 숫자 μž…λ ₯ ν•„λ“œμ— λŒ€ν•œ 인라인 μœ νš¨μ„± 검사 κ°œμ„  - #256

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
palette-empty-numeric-input-9050254738039100090
Closed

🎨 Palette: 빈 숫자 μž…λ ₯ ν•„λ“œμ— λŒ€ν•œ 인라인 μœ νš¨μ„± 검사 κ°œμ„ #256
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
palette-empty-numeric-input-9050254738039100090

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ’‘ What: target_bytes 및 batch_target_bytes 숫자 μž…λ ₯ ν•„λ“œμ—μ„œ 값을 μ§€μ›Œ 빈칸이 될 λ•Œ μ»€μŠ€ν…€ μœ νš¨μ„± 검사 였λ₯˜(Must be greater than 0)κ°€ λ°œμƒν•˜μ§€ μ•Šκ³  였λ₯˜λ₯Ό μ΄ˆκΈ°ν™”ν•˜λ„λ‘ λ³€κ²½ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
🎯 Why: 빈 μž…λ ₯ ν•„λ“œλ₯Ό parseInt둜 νŒŒμ‹±ν•˜λ©΄ NaN이 λ°˜ν™˜λ˜κ³ , 이둜 인해 μ‚¬μš©μžκ°€ μž…λ ₯을 μ§€μš°λŠ” μˆœκ°„ μ‹œκ°μ μœΌλ‘œ κ±°μŠ¬λ¦¬λŠ” μœ νš¨μ„± 였λ₯˜κ°€ ν‘œμ‹œλ˜μ–΄ λ‚˜μœ μ‚¬μš©μž κ²½ν—˜μ„ μ œκ³΅ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. HTML5 κΈ°λ³Έ 속성(required)이 빈 μƒνƒœλ₯Ό μ²˜λ¦¬ν•˜λ„λ‘ μœ„μž„ν•˜λŠ” 것이 μ’‹μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
πŸ“Έ Before/After: 빈칸일 λ•Œ μ—λŸ¬κ°€ 더 이상 λ…ΈμΆœλ˜μ§€ μ•ŠμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
β™Ώ Accessibility: 슀크린 λ¦¬λ”μ—μ„œ 빈 폼에 μ ‘κ·Όν•  λ•Œ λΆˆν•„μš”ν•˜κ²Œ aria-invalid='true'와 μ»€μŠ€ν…€ μœ νš¨μ„± μ—λŸ¬ λ©”μ‹œμ§€κ°€ μ½νžˆλŠ” ν˜Όλž€μ„ μ€„μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9050254738039100090 started by @seonghobae

* Clear validation error text for `target_bytes` and `batch_target_bytes` when input is empty.
* Update palette journal with learnings.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

* Clear validation error text for `target_bytes` and `batch_target_bytes` when input is empty.
* Update palette journal with learnings.
* Clear validation error text for `target_bytes` and `batch_target_bytes` when input is empty.
* Update palette journal with learnings.
* Clear validation error text for `target_bytes` and `batch_target_bytes` when input is empty.
* Update palette journal with learnings.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 5df0ee6ef8b600bb4d06cb757dc948709ab3c14f.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 5df0ee6ef8b600bb4d06cb757dc948709ab3c14f
  • Workflow run: 29764627574
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 5df0ee6ef8b600bb4d06cb757dc948709ab3c14f.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closed as a duplicate of #274. #274 is the single canonical implementation for both numeric fields and includes the complete empty-state reset contract: custom validity, aria-invalid, preview text, preset selection state, and early return before numeric parsing.

@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Aug 6, 2026
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closed as a duplicate of #274. #274 is the single canonical implementation for both numeric fields and includes the complete empty-state reset contract: custom validity, aria-invalid, preview text, preset selection state, and early return before numeric parsing.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is a duplicate of #274 and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant