Skip to content

🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] μŠ€μ½”μ–΄ λ·°μ–΄ μ•„μ΄μ½˜ λ²„νŠΌ 툴팁 μΆ”κ°€ 및 μ ‘κ·Όμ„± κ°œμ„ #656

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
palette-ux-improvement-4275408928266692312
Open

🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] μŠ€μ½”μ–΄ λ·°μ–΄ μ•„μ΄μ½˜ λ²„νŠΌ 툴팁 μΆ”κ°€ 및 μ ‘κ·Όμ„± κ°œμ„ #656
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
palette-ux-improvement-4275408928266692312

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

πŸ’‘ What: μŠ€μ½”μ–΄ λ·°μ–΄ 및 μŠ€μ½”μ–΄ 뷰의 μ•„μ΄μ½˜ μ „μš© λ²„νŠΌμ— νˆ΄νŒμ„ μΆ”κ°€ν•˜κ³ , λΉ„ν™œμ„±ν™”λœ 이전/λ‹€μŒ νŽ˜μ΄μ§€ λ²„νŠΌμ„ aria-disabledλ₯Ό μ‚¬μš©ν•˜λ„λ‘ κ°œμ„ ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
🎯 Why: μ‹œκ°μž₯μ• κ°€ μ•„λ‹Œ 일반 μ‚¬μš©μžλ“€λ„ μ•„μ΄μ½˜ λ²„νŠΌμ˜ 의미λ₯Ό ν˜Έλ²„ μ‹œ μ‰½κ²Œ νŒŒμ•…ν•  수 μžˆλ„λ‘ νˆ΄νŒμ„ μ œκ³΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚¬μš©μ„±μ„ ν–₯μƒμ‹œν‚€κ³ , λΉ„ν™œμ„±ν™”λœ μƒνƒœμ—μ„œλ„ 접근성을 κ°œμ„ ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•¨μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€.
πŸ“Έ Before/After: ν•΄λ‹Ή μ—†μŒ (μ‹œκ°μ  λ³€κ²½ μ—†μŒ, ν˜Έλ²„ μ‹œ 툴팁 좔가됨)
β™Ώ Accessibility: μ•„μ΄μ½˜ μ „μš© λ²„νŠΌμ— title 속성을 μΆ”κ°€ν•˜κ³ , λΉ„ν™œμ„±ν™”λœ λ²„νŠΌμ΄ aria-disabled 속성을 가지도둝 ν•˜μ—¬ ν‚€λ³΄λ“œ ν¬μ»€μŠ€μ™€ 접근성을 보μž₯ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 4275408928266692312 started by @seonghobae

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 42fb0699c8665edd76f6301bfe81b393a754beee.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 42fb0699c8665edd76f6301bfe81b393a754beee
  • Workflow run: 29505873282
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 42fb0699c8665edd76f6301bfe81b393a754beee.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant