Skip to content

docs: add DeepWiki entry point and Pages-ready product guide - #319

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/public-surface-deepwiki-pages
Closed

docs: add DeepWiki entry point and Pages-ready product guide#319
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/public-surface-deepwiki-pages

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Outcome

Improve the aFIPC public surface without changing calibration behavior.

  • add the canonical Ask DeepWiki badge with exact repository casing;
  • replace the README opening with concise product-facing responsibility for fixed-item IRT linking/equating;
  • add docs/index.md with product scope, core workflow, architecture, onboarding, release/change-control guidance, and documentation entry points;
  • preserve existing maintenance and numerical-compatibility guidance below the public-facing overview.

Public-surface follow-up

The repository currently has homepage=null and has_pages=false. This PR provides the owned docs/index.md prerequisite only; Pages should not be claimed live until the organization metadata reconciler enables the intended source and HTTPS publication is re-read successfully.

The current repository description is already broadly accurate but can be normalized centrally to a concise customer-facing form such as “Automated fixed-item parameter calibration for IRT linking and equating.” Existing useful psychometrics/IRT/C++ topics should be preserved while central ecosystem/lifecycle topics are reconciled declaratively.

Concurrency

No open PR currently owns README or docs/index.md; active aFIPC writers are focused on R implementation/security/performance changes. This branch is based on protected master@f87c2324f1686135e57d8730c1b0b9420874f300 and touches documentation only.


Devin Review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 문서
    • README에 DeepWiki 배지와 저장소 설명을 추가하고, 문서·운영·개발 상태 안내를 간결하게 정리했습니다.
    • 저장소 구성, 알고리즘 호환성, GitHub Actions 및 Dependabot 운영 정책을 명시했습니다.
    • aFIPC의 목적, 워크플로, 패키지 구조, 온보딩, 릴리스 및 변경 관리 정책을 새 문서로 추가했습니다.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 8a9ead63-9a09-4543-8785-96ecfc23ace0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f87c232 and 066150a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • docs/index.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md를 갱신하고 docs/index.md를 추가했습니다. 문서는 aFIPC의 목적, 저장소 구조, 호환성, 운영 가드레일, 개발 절차 및 지원 리소스를 설명합니다.

Changes

저장소 문서 갱신

Layer / File(s) Summary
저장소 개요 및 운영 정책
README.md
DeepWiki 배지와 aFIPC 설명을 추가했습니다. 저장소 구성, 알고리즘 호환성, GitHub Actions 및 Dependabot 운영 가드레일을 갱신했습니다. autoFIPC() 유지보수 정책 문장을 정리했습니다.
프로젝트 전체 문서
docs/index.md
aFIPC의 책임, 핵심 처리 단계, R 패키지 구조, 검사 명령, 온보딩, 릴리스 정책, 관련 문서 및 지원 리소스를 추가했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/public-surface-deepwiki-pages

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing this duplicate public-surface lane after a full writer re-check found that #261 already owns the canonical README/docs surface, including the exact-cased Ask DeepWiki badge and a Pages-ready docs/index.md. The repository-facing work should remain consolidated in #261 rather than creating a competing README/docs writer. I also removed the stale area: ci-cd classification from #261 because it changes documentation/ADRs only and no CI workflow.

@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Sep 2, 2026

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

Devin Review

Comment thread README.md
produce accurate fixed-item linking results. The current maintenance goal is to
preserve numerical behavior while modernizing repository operations
(documentation, CI, and dependency hygiene).
Automated Fixed Item Parameter Calibration (FIPC) for IRT test linking and equating. aFIPC helps psychometric teams preserve score-scale continuity across test forms by fixing anchor-item parameters while estimating parameters for newly administered items.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Markdown lint blocks the pull request

The new prose exceeds the configured line limit, so markdownlint-cli2 reports 11 violations. The required Code Quality check fails.

Prompt for agents
Wrap the new prose in README.md and docs/index.md to the configured 80-character Markdown line limit. Run the repository's exact markdownlint-cli2 0.18.1 command from .github/workflows/code-quality.yml and ensure all 11 introduced MD013 violations are cleared.
Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed on current branch after the public-surface and licensing expansion: README.md and docs/index.md prose are wrapped to the repository's 80-character Markdown line-length contract. The only intentionally long lines are URL/code forms that markdownlint treats under its configured exceptions. Exact-head checks must regenerate on the new head; predecessor review/check evidence is not reused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant