Skip to content

Unify projects and issues lifecycle UX (AXI-108)#40

Merged
Codename-11 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/axi-108-projects-issues-ux
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

Unify projects and issues lifecycle UX (AXI-108)#40
Codename-11 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/axi-108-projects-issues-ux

Conversation

@Codename-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add an explicit Open/All lifecycle scope shared by global issue List and Kanban views and project List and Board tabs
  • keep counts, search labels, empty-state recovery, URLs, board columns, and result eligibility aligned across presentations
  • remove duplicate Done/updated controls and hide the empty saved-view row
  • improve project creation with required-field cues, immutable key guidance, accessible color selection, validation recovery, and direct post-create navigation
  • expose clearer project completion progress and add regression coverage

Why

Completed issues could appear or disappear solely from switching between List and Kanban, while the UI did not clearly communicate whether terminal work was included. Project creation also deferred required-field guidance until submission, did not explain the immutable key, retained stale validation feedback, and returned users to the grid after creation.

User impact

Issue search and filtering now have a visible, predictable lifecycle baseline. Users can recover completed search results directly, presentation changes no longer alter the result universe, and new-project setup provides clearer guidance and a more direct continuation flow.

Validation

  • pnpm typecheck
  • pnpm lint (passes with existing repository warnings)
  • pnpm exec vitest run tests/unit/saved-view-filters.test.ts — 13 passed
  • fresh isolated production E2E build
  • pnpm exec playwright test tests/e2e/issues-scope.spec.ts --workers=1 — 2 passed
  • Prettier and git diff --check

The unconfigured full pnpm test integration run could not connect because this shell did not provide DATABASE_URL or AUTH_SECRET; the focused dependency-free suite and isolated production browser flows passed.

@Codename-11 Codename-11 marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2026 19:10
@Codename-11 Codename-11 merged commit 774086e into main Jul 15, 2026
3 checks passed
@Codename-11 Codename-11 deleted the codex/axi-108-projects-issues-ux branch July 15, 2026 19:10

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dbf85a52b9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

view: next.view !== undefined ? next.view : (activeViewId ?? viewIdFromUrl),
dueOn: next.dueOn !== undefined ? next.dueOn : dueOn,
archived: next.archived ?? showArchived,
scope: next.scope ?? scope,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Avoid persisting derived All scope

When a DONE/CANCELED status facet is active, scope is derived as "all" even if the URL never requested scope=all; any later filter change that does not pass next.scope uses this fallback and writes scope=all into the URL. For example, selecting a Done status and then toggling that same facet off removes the terminal filter but leaves the page in All scope, so completed issues continue to appear until the user manually clears filters or presses Open. Recompute the fallback from the next filters/requested URL scope instead of persisting the derived value.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant