Is this a new report?
Yes
System Info
Void 6.1.21_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rFFFFFFF
Package(s) Affected
texlive-20210325_5, texlive-Xdvi-20210325_5
Does a report exist for this bug with the project's home (upstream) and/or another distro?
No response
Expected behaviour
I have texlive installed but I don't have texlive-Xdvi installed (because it isn't a dependency of texlive). texlive provides the /usr/bin/extractbb program which is actually a symlink to /usr/bin/xdvipdfmx. I expect extractbb to work.
Actual behaviour
/usr/bin/extractbb is a broken symlink because /usr/bin/xdvipdfmx doesn't exist because texlive-Xdvi isn't installed.
Normally I would have added texlive-Xdvi as a dependency of texlive myself but because texlive-Xdvi is a subpackage of texlive, the "correct" solution would (I think) be to merge these two packages and remove texlive-Xdvi which could be complex.
Steps to reproduce
-
-
Is this a new report?
Yes
System Info
Void 6.1.21_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rFFFFFFF
Package(s) Affected
texlive-20210325_5, texlive-Xdvi-20210325_5
Does a report exist for this bug with the project's home (upstream) and/or another distro?
No response
Expected behaviour
I have
texliveinstalled but I don't havetexlive-Xdviinstalled (because it isn't a dependency oftexlive).texliveprovides the/usr/bin/extractbbprogram which is actually a symlink to/usr/bin/xdvipdfmx. I expectextractbbto work.Actual behaviour
/usr/bin/extractbbis a broken symlink because/usr/bin/xdvipdfmxdoesn't exist becausetexlive-Xdviisn't installed.Normally I would have added
texlive-Xdvias a dependency oftexlivemyself but becausetexlive-Xdviis a subpackage oftexlive, the "correct" solution would (I think) be to merge these two packages and removetexlive-Xdviwhich could be complex.Steps to reproduce