RFC: OAuth 2.0 Flow Management #448
Unanswered
marvindanig
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
|
I have my answer. Thanks! |
0 replies
|
Sincere apologies, I just happened to see this now. We're monitoring issues as they come up, but discussions aren't getting flagged for some reason and it got lost in the noise. Again, sorry about that. Yes, this is absolutely on the roadmap and something we'd be happy to work together on. I opened a similar issue here and it's something we'd be happy to proritize: Rather than PRs, we're trying to operate this project by spending time up-front speccing issues, which we're then feeding into a development harness to implement and test. If you could take the time to add your reqirements and thoughts to the existing issue, we'll work with you to get them implemented ASAP. |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hey folks 👋
We’re considering Jentic Mini as our credential + broker layer for a multi-tenant SaaS product. The vault/broker architecture looks like a great fit, and the Apache 2.0 license is a big reason we’re evaluating it.
One gap we’ve identified is OAuth 2.0 lifecycle support. Many integrations we need (Google, Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, etc.) require full OAuth — redirect, callback, token exchange, and refresh rotation. Token storage is covered well, but the OAuth lifecycle itself doesn’t appear to be handled end-to-end yet.
We’d be open to contributing an OAuth module, potentially including:
Wanted to check first:
Happy to write up a short design doc / RFC first if useful.
Thanks!
All reactions