make resolver naming consistent in example

Align resolver function name in docs: `resolveHumanQuery` -> `resolveHuman`, so both examples use the same naming.

Author: evis

src/pages/learn/execution.mdx

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ At the top level of every GraphQL server is an Object type that represents the p
 In this example, our `Query` type provides a field called `human` which accepts the argument `id`. The resolver function for this field likely accesses a database and then constructs and returns a `Human` type:
 
 ```js
-function resolveHumanQuery(obj, args, context, info) {
+function resolveHuman(obj, args, context, info) {
   return context.db.loadHumanByID(args.id).then(userData => new Human(userData));
 }
 ```
@@ -170,4 +170,4 @@ To recap what we've learned about execution:
 - When a field on an Object type returns a List type of other objects, additional data may need to be fetched from the underlying data source to transform any foreign key-like references (such as IDs) into the related objects
 - Once all of the requested fields have been resolved to the expected leaf values, the result is sent to the client, typically as JSON
 
-Now that we understand how operations are executed, we can move to the last stage of the lifecycle of a GraphQL request where the [response](/learn/response/) is delivered to a client.
+Now that we understand how operations are executed, we can move to the last stage of the lifecycle of a GraphQL request where the [response](/learn/response/) is delivered to a client.