I was working on calculating some normalization values from WeatherBench2 ERA5 and noticed that mean_top_downward_shortwave_radiation_flux has nan values everywhere on Earth and potentially throughout the whole dataset. I spot checked in xr.open_zarr('gs://weatherbench2/datasets/era5/1959-2023_01_10-wb13-6h-1440x721_with_derived_variables.zarr') and saw the same issue in the 240x121 version of the dataset. Other variables are fine when I pull them down, so I don't think the issue is on my end. I'm kinda surprised this one hasn't been caught before, but maybe people are using their own solar calculations or sin(day of year) instead of what is in weatherbench. We have implemented our own solar calculations in CREDIT, so fixing this is not super urgent but would be nice to have for future intercomparisons.
I was working on calculating some normalization values from WeatherBench2 ERA5 and noticed that
mean_top_downward_shortwave_radiation_fluxhas nan values everywhere on Earth and potentially throughout the whole dataset. I spot checked inxr.open_zarr('gs://weatherbench2/datasets/era5/1959-2023_01_10-wb13-6h-1440x721_with_derived_variables.zarr')and saw the same issue in the240x121version of the dataset. Other variables are fine when I pull them down, so I don't think the issue is on my end. I'm kinda surprised this one hasn't been caught before, but maybe people are using their own solar calculations or sin(day of year) instead of what is in weatherbench. We have implemented our own solar calculations in CREDIT, so fixing this is not super urgent but would be nice to have for future intercomparisons.