Simplify subclasses list, remove from Box

Currently we maintain the subclasses list for two separate purposes (we essentially have to different relationships we're putting into the same list):

1. On a T_MODULE, we track the T_ICLASSes created to include it into
   other classes. Used for method invalidation and propagating includes
   on the module that happen after it's been used
2. On a T_CLASS/T_ICLASS, we track the T_CLASS/T_ICLASS which are the
   immediate children of the class. We use this for method invalidation,
   some cvar things, and to iterate through subclasses.

Purpose 1 does not have any issues with box, the T_ICLASS always belongs
to one specific module and that's immutable. This list can be box-global
(always use the prime classext or hoist it out) and only needs to be
pruned during free. If we care about behaviour under a particular box
(ie. the propagating includes), we should look up the current box being
modified on the ICLASS itself.

Purpose 2 is more complicated. It currently tracks the immediate
children, the T_CLASS or T_ICLASS whose super points back. Because super
is per-box and is mutable (include/prepend insert ICLASSes into the
chain) we need to update the list on include/prepend, entries must be
per-box, and we can have multiple entries per-box. *I propose we
simplify this by no longer tracking the immediate subclass*, but instead
tracking the T_CLASS -> ... -> T_CLASS relationship, ie. the inverse of
rb_class_superclass. That relationship is the same across all boxes and
immutable after Class creation.

As a special case the ICLASS for refinements are also added to the
purpose 2 list (on T_CLASS). As those ICLASS do not chain to an eventual
leaf T_CLASS.

When we need to find the classes which have included a module, we can
use the module subclasses list to find the ICLASS and then use
RCLASS_INCLUDER. If we needed to iterate all T_ICLASS, we could then
walk up the CLASS_SUPER chain, but I didn't find anywhere we needed to
do that.

Author: jhawthorn