Commit 8b5763e
midx: avoid duplicate packed_git entries
When we scan a pack directory to load the idx entries we find into the
packed_git list, we skip any of them that are contained in a midx. We
then load them later lazily if we actually need to access the
corresponding pack, referencing them both from the midx struct and the
packed_git list.
The lazy-load in the midx code checks to see if the midx already
mentions the pack, but doesn't otherwise check the packed_git list. This
makes sense, since we should have added any pack to both lists.
But there's a loophole! If we call close_object_store(), that frees the
midx entirely, but _not_ the packed_git structs, which we must keep
around for Reasons[1]. If we then try to look up more objects, we'll
auto-load the midx again, which won't realize that we've already loaded
those packs, and will create duplicate entries in the packed_git list.
This is possibly inefficient, because it means we may open and map the
pack redundantly. But it can also lead to weird user-visible behavior.
The case I found is in "git repack", which closes and reopens the midx
after repacking and then calls update_server_info(). We end up writing
the duplicate entries into objects/info/packs.
We could obviously de-dup them while writing that file, but it seems
like a violation of more core assumptions that we end up with these
duplicate structs at all.
We can avoid the duplicates reasonably efficiently by checking their
names in the pack_map hash. This annoyingly does require a little more
than a straight hash lookup due to the naming conventions, but it should
only happen when we are about to actually open a pack. I don't think one
extra malloc will be noticeable there.
[1] I'm not entirely sure of all the details, except that we generally
assume the packed_git structs never go away. We noted this
restriction in the comment added by 6f1e939 (object: fix leaking
packfiles when closing object store, 2024-08-08), but it's somewhat
vague. At any rate, if you try freeing the structs in
close_object_store(), you can observe segfaults all over the test
suite. So it might be fixable, but it's not trivial.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>1 parent 6a11438 commit 8b5763e
2 files changed
Lines changed: 25 additions & 3 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
445 | 445 | | |
446 | 446 | | |
447 | 447 | | |
| 448 | + | |
448 | 449 | | |
449 | 450 | | |
450 | 451 | | |
| |||
455 | 456 | | |
456 | 457 | | |
457 | 458 | | |
458 | | - | |
| 459 | + | |
| 460 | + | |
| 461 | + | |
| 462 | + | |
| 463 | + | |
| 464 | + | |
| 465 | + | |
| 466 | + | |
| 467 | + | |
| 468 | + | |
| 469 | + | |
| 470 | + | |
| 471 | + | |
| 472 | + | |
| 473 | + | |
459 | 474 | | |
| 475 | + | |
460 | 476 | | |
461 | 477 | | |
462 | 478 | | |
463 | 479 | | |
464 | 480 | | |
465 | 481 | | |
466 | | - | |
467 | | - | |
468 | 482 | | |
469 | 483 | | |
470 | 484 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
39 | 39 | | |
40 | 40 | | |
41 | 41 | | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
42 | 50 | | |
0 commit comments