Replies: 2 comments
|
Not expected — the filtering is there and it is applied broadly, so something specific is failing rather than the feature being absent. In const hiddenModelsByProvider = getHiddenModelsByProvider();and then runs The interesting part is the comment sitting directly above that helper, because it describes exactly the symptom you are reporting as a bug that was already hit once:
In other words, the settings UI records "this model is hidden" under one key, the catalog looks it up under another, the lookup misses, and the model reappears in const keysToCheck = [providerKey, canonical, alias, nodePrefix].filter(
(k): k is string => Boolean(k)
);Which means a hide written under some fifth key — or under a key that does not resolve to any of those four for your particular provider — still leaks through. That is the shape of what you are seeing. So the detail worth adding to your report is which provider. You mention "any provider with a large number of models", which suggests OpenRouter or a compatible/custom node, and those are precisely the cases where the raw connection key, the canonical id and the alias are most likely to diverge. With the provider named, whoever picks this up can check what |
|
Hey @asully22! Confirmed -- real bug, not expected behavior. On the current release/v3.8.50 tree the unified Opened #11475 to track it. (@MLuc24 thanks for digging in -- note the catalog.ts snippet quoted isn't present at the current tip, which matches the repro.) |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
When I hide models on the provider settings, they are still showing up in my v1/models list making any provider with a large number of models explode my list. Is this expected?
All reactions