diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION index 71d6a66..c34958a 100644 --- a/VERSION +++ b/VERSION @@ -1 +1 @@ -0.1.14 +0.1.15 diff --git a/adlc/factory-implement/SKILL.md b/adlc/factory-implement/SKILL.md index f68e1f0..d9073dc 100644 --- a/adlc/factory-implement/SKILL.md +++ b/adlc/factory-implement/SKILL.md @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ name: factory-implement description: Implement accepted application work in its designated workspace and produce a working candidate with evidence for independent review. license: MIT metadata: - version: "0.1.4" - updated: "2026-10-09" + version: "0.1.15" + updated: "2026-10-15" --- # Implement diff --git a/adlc/factory-implement/references/review-handoff.md b/adlc/factory-implement/references/review-handoff.md index ce2ffdc..e64c73e 100644 --- a/adlc/factory-implement/references/review-handoff.md +++ b/adlc/factory-implement/references/review-handoff.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Make the change easy to review -Revision: 0.1.4 · Updated: 2026-10-09 +Revision: 0.1.15 · Updated: 2026-10-15 Use when preparing or revising a PR or substantive handoff for a person. The implementer owns this presentation; independent review checks its claims, and @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ AgentOps brings forward any remaining owner decision. Use the existing PR and evidence locations. A small change needs a small explanation, not every section below or a second report. +Write GitHub issues, PRs and Factory documentation in English unless the user +explicitly requests another language. The language of the conversation, such as +Danish brainstorming, does not request it. + Lead with the concrete problem and resulting behavior in plain language. Show one useful before/after example from the actual change. Point to the few files or views that deserve attention and explain any material tradeoff or decision. diff --git a/agent-ops/factory-agent-ops/SKILL.md b/agent-ops/factory-agent-ops/SKILL.md index e1b05d4..2b33a4e 100644 --- a/agent-ops/factory-agent-ops/SKILL.md +++ b/agent-ops/factory-agent-ops/SKILL.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name: factory-agent-ops description: Act as a project's lead for ideas, research, accepted tasks or an approved backlog; coordinate native workers, independent review and authorized delivery. license: MIT metadata: - version: "0.1.14" + version: "0.1.15" updated: "2026-10-15" --- @@ -62,7 +62,9 @@ findings; a successful tool call or finished turn does not establish acceptance. Recheck affected evidence after fixes, rebases or changed scope. Write issue openings, progress updates and final handoffs for the person reading -them. Lead with the useful point in plain words, understandable without the chat +them, in English unless the user explicitly requests another language; chatting +in another language is not such a request. Lead with +the useful point in plain words, understandable without the chat or opening links. Use a real example when it clarifies the change, such as an actual before/after excerpt or result; use real images when they show a visible change better. Keep a failure diff --git a/docs/qualification.md b/docs/qualification.md index bbed35d..3a491de 100644 --- a/docs/qualification.md +++ b/docs/qualification.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Qualification -Revision: 0.1.14 · Updated: 2026-10-15 +Revision: 0.1.15 · Updated: 2026-10-15 This record distinguishes source review, disposable exercises and observed native operation. A package release does not qualify another host, every future update @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ remain with the installation; public issues track the remaining acceptance work. | --- | --- | --- | | Package | Eight portable skills, metadata/link checks and staging tests | Mechanical checks do not establish agent decisions | | Foundation readiness handoff (0.1.12 candidate) | 2026-10-11: [Factory #27](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/27) source change after an AIOS assessment accepted a stale mandatory authoring self-dependency, its disabled private reporting was found only by readback, its lead could not read its private record, and Project1's current README kept stale pre-delivery claims (coordinator observations, not reproduced here). Package, unit and staging checks only | Behavioral evidence and independent review are pending in the delivery PR. Native binding/authentication behavior stays with [Factory #3](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/3); Markdown does not repair it | +| English deliverables (0.1.15 candidate) | 2026-10-15: owner instruction that GitHub issues, PRs and Factory documentation default to English, and that Danish brainstorming does not request Danish deliverables. AgentOps and the Implement review handoff now state this default and its explicit-request exception. On the same owner instruction the lead published the runtime audit in English as [Factory #39](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/39) and rewrote the [#32](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/32) and [#34](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/34) descriptions in English, each independently read back in English | Source change plus real reporting corrections made on owner instruction; not proof that a model applies the rule on its own. Source checks and independent review are recorded in the delivery PR | | Human-facing updates (0.1.14 candidate) | 2026-10-15: [Factory #36](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/36) after the lead's [#35 comment](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/35#issuecomment-6193954207) opened with a native version line, a five-row terminology table and long source paragraphs. The same comment was rewritten and read back to open with the finding in plain words and one before/after of the guide, with checks and the freshness limit visible and sources in optional details. AgentOps source clarified for issue openings, progress updates and final handoffs | One authored issue revision, not a comprehension measurement, future agent reliability, native permission or app UI change. Source checks and independent review are recorded in the delivery PR | | Usage readiness (0.1.14 candidate) | 2026-10-15: [Factory #35](https://github.com/arcitai/factory/issues/35) source assessment of T3 upstream `d83929ad` usage docs, usage contract and environment-auth guidance (lead research, not reproduced here). The lead observed a native identity readback of the execution host's running server. The existing Mac operator then observed Usage in native Nightly 3010 (`d83929ad0bb0`) with one environment (selecting it still reads All environments): Cost, Tokens and Limits; 24 h/7 d/30 d/90 d history; Codex/Claude Code provider menu; Model or Day breakdown; no project, thread or account filter; Cost labeled an API estimate with unpriced usage itemized; Tokens as input, cache read, cache write and output; Limits showing account reset windows with history-period controls disabled. No refresh, reset, setting, account or billing change; the original view was restored | Limits showed no stale/unknown/error marker but no unambiguous as-of time, so quota freshness is not established. No project accounting, per-project quota, OS isolation or host adoption proof; upstream project attribution was unmerged at the 2026-10-15 readback. Package/unit/staging checks and independent review are tracked in the delivery PR | | Review check artifacts (0.1.13 candidate) | 2026-10-12: source change after an application operator reported (not reproduced here) that an OpenPaperDesign reviewer was told to modify no files yet asked to compile/test; Rust targets filled the shared `/tmp` quota, automatic approval refused cleanup under that instruction and the reviewer held without bypass. The operator later removed only an earlier completed task's rebuildable target after checking no process used it. Package, unit and staging checks only | Behavioral evidence for source-only, authorized-check-output and shared/active-artifact cases and independent review are recorded in the delivery PR. Project scratch setup stays with that project |