Skip to content

CDCPD Constructor should be refactored #43

@dcolli23

Description

@dcolli23

The constructor for CDCPD is messy and should be refactored. I've got most of the way there with https://github.com/UM-ARM-Lab/cdcpd/tree/cdcpd_constructor_refactor but there was a problem with the pybind11 bindings that I didn't have time to fix.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions