Skip to content

decide raster resolution: 240 m vs 120 m #162

Description

@achubaty

Evaluate whether running at 120 m (local$res) materially improves outputs and is practical: ~4× the pixels means roughly 4× RAM, scratch and runtime per study area, which feeds the per-node budgeting.

Must be applied globally — all study areas at the same resolution — so results stay comparable across areas. This is an all-or-nothing fleet-wide choice, not a per-area one.

Current default is 240 m.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions