From e10a2e0d2fb3d92fe64d61568feeae5549e867e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: OpenCnid Notes Maintainer Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:45:37 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Re-verify note against arXiv:2508.01581v1 (2026-07-20): verified clean, refresh date Independent re-verification of density-chain.md against the pinned source (arXiv:2508.01581v1). Every T1-T5 claim, entity-ledger locator, Key-results value, Table 1 OLS / Table 2 spline / Table 3 tier descriptives, both R^2 figures (0.217 / 0.297), and the three-level tier collapse were reconfirmed at the source. The absence of any adaptable-vs-non-adaptable statistic was reconfirmed. No discrepancies found. Refresh verified_against_source to 2026-07-20 in frontmatter and index.json; append the clean re-verification to provenance while preserving the 2026-07-19 correction history. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 --- density-chain.md | 15 ++++++++++++--- index.json | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/density-chain.md b/density-chain.md index 698b868..8cc1bc2 100644 --- a/density-chain.md +++ b/density-chain.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ venue: "arXiv preprint (cs.AI; math.CO; stat.CO), 2025" source: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01581 (pinned: arXiv:2508.01581v1, 2025-08-03)" license: "CC BY 4.0" date_summarized: 2026-07-18 -verified_against_source: 2026-07-19 +verified_against_source: 2026-07-20 tier_budget_words: 150 tags: [adaptive-agents, agent-design, meta-prompting, topos-theory, sheaf-theory, rough-fuzzy-sets, monte-carlo, llm] entity_ledger: @@ -362,12 +362,21 @@ and came back with corrections. - Released data: https://github.com/cadavid1/PCF (verified as the embedded hyperlink behind the Abstract's "See GitHub here") - Earlier version: Research Square (rs-6397317/v1), per the paper's header note -- Verified against source: 2026-07-19, against the arXiv v1 PDF; section, table, - and figure numbering follows that rendering +- Verified against source: 2026-07-20, against the arXiv v1 PDF; section, table, + and figure numbering follows that rendering. Prior verification: 2026-07-19 + (corrections itemized below). - Tier budget convention: 150 words of prose per tier, bracketed locators excluded from the count. All five tiers are exactly 150 under that rule, so density is the only variable across the chain. - Revisions or errata noticed since: none in the source +- **Re-verification on 2026-07-20**, source-first against arXiv:2508.01581v1: + every T1–T5 claim, the entity-ledger locators, the Key-results table, the + Table 1 OLS figures, the Table 2 spline figures, the Table 3 tier + descriptives, both R² values (0.217 OLS / 0.297 spline), the three-level + tier collapse (5-star distinct; 4-star ≈ 3-star; 2-star ≈ 1-star with 1-star + marginally higher on both measures), and the absence of any + adaptable-vs-non-adaptable statistic were all reconfirmed at the source. No + discrepancies found; verification date refreshed only. - **Corrections applied to this note on 2026-07-19**, all source-first: 1. The headline finding was misstated across all five tiers as "adaptable agents beat static ones, but the benefit shrinks as complexity rises." The diff --git a/index.json b/index.json index 5e2f687..e8598ee 100644 --- a/index.json +++ b/index.json @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { "schema_version": 1, - "updated": "2026-07-18", + "updated": "2026-07-20", "repo": "https://github.com/OpenCnid/pcf-adaptive-agents", "notes": [ { @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ "pinned_date": "2025-08-03", "source_license": "CC BY 4.0", "date_summarized": "2026-07-18", - "verified_against_source": "2026-07-19", + "verified_against_source": "2026-07-20", "tier_budget_words": 150, "tags": ["adaptive-agents", "agent-design", "meta-prompting", "topos-theory", "sheaf-theory", "rough-fuzzy-sets", "monte-carlo", "llm"] }