Protobuf V3

[runeglom]

Hi, as the need for protobuf V3 support has popped up on our end, we have started the PR
#29

We are grateful for any review and happy to discuss changes or improvements 😄

Cheers!

---

Not on my end. Generally speaking, there's no additional feature development planned, since this package currently meets all of DisasterAWARE's requirements.

I'm happy to review PRs though.

Originally posted by @nickzandbergen in #15

[hrishikeshnayak7]

Hi, I also require the proto3 changes as they’d be really helpful for our use case. Do you have any updates on when the PR might be merged?

[metal3dl]

I’m also looking forward to the proto3 updates, they’d be really useful for our project as well

[nickzandbergen]

Hello. Among other issues, the PR does not have schema registry support so it won't be merged.

I'm confused as to why you're making a feature request here instead of a standalone library?